MHHS Related Metering Points across Market Segments

Date of latest update
Type
Issue
ID
I0275
Change Category
Other Industry Codes impacted
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
06/11/2025 - Following discussions at the Change Issues Group on 06 November, a REC guidance will be developed to support the resolution of this Issue after which it will be classed as resolved.
Summary
It has been identified by the MHHS Data Cleanse Working Group (DCWG) that around 9,000 existing Metering Point Relationships include Metering Points that would migrate into different Market-wide Half Hourly Settlement (MHHS) Market Segments. The majority of these are where one Metering Point has a Traditional meter installed (Smart Segment) and a Related Metering Point has an Advanced meter (Advanced Segment). This situation is currently valid but in MHHS would cause two problems. - SMRS would not be able to align the agent appointments, leaving secondary MPANs without agents and MHHS Migrations unable to fully complete.
Proposer
jonny.moore_42
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Problem Statement
Without considering this Issue, there will be a risk to the MHHS migration. Indeed, a Metering Point installed which does not match its Related Metering Point (for example a Relationship between a Traditional meter with an Advanced Meter) will not be able to fully migrate to MHHS arrangements.
I0275 submission form
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required

Gas Pressure and Capacity Information Transparency

Date of latest update
Type
Issue
ID
I0274
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
21/07/2026 - Change Report (Proposal Re-Plan) approved at Change Panel
Summary
As per Section 13.4.18 of CoMCoP, retrieving gas pressure and capacity information from Transporters via the GT1 process can be time consuming for Energy Suppliers/MAMs and/or Consumers. The process of retrieving this information is inconsistent and service timescales are varied between transporters. Gas pressure and capacity information should be readily available through the Gas Enquiry Service to enable timely processing of site work and requests to enable MAM’s and Suppliers to appropriately service their customers.
Proposer
Carl Whitehouse
Impacted REC Services
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Problem Statement
For some Energy Suppliers, MAMs and consumers, retrieving pressure and capacity information via the GT1 process can be time consuming. This is due to elements like response timescales and methods (batch responses vs individual responses) being varied among GTs. This ultimately has a negative impact on customers waiting on site work, such as a new connection, for example.
SME
SME Role
Lead Technical Analyst
SME Role
Lead Assurance Analyst
I0274 submission form
I0274 Change Report (Proposal Plan) V1.0 approved 18.11.25
IG174 Change Proposal Re-Plan v2.0 approved 21.07.2026
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required

Sharing of SSC and TPR Information for MHHS Smart and Advanced Meters

Date of latest update
Type
Issue
ID
I0273
Change Category
Other Industry Codes impacted
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
23/06/2026 - The Code Manager has published an Interim Guidance Document for I0273.
Summary
In the MHHS design the Standard Settlement Configuration (SSC) is a non-mandatory data item for Smart and Advanced metering points, in addition the register level TPR information is not shared in the MTD flows for these meters (IF-006 for Smart and D0268 for Advanced). It was identified through BSC Issue I118 that there is a requirement for the SSC to be set for Domestic / Microbusiness Advanced Metering Points making use of the HH data opt out and there may be other areas where the SSC is required.
Proposer
jonny.moore_42
Change Report - Initial Assessment and Change Plan Report

Comments deadline
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
REC Decision Maker
Lead Analyst
James Hardy
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
I0273 - Interim Guidance Document V1.1
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
The MHHS design does not mandate the use of SSC or support register-level TPR data for Smart and Advanced Meters, creating gaps in data availability for certain Settlement scenarios.
SME
SME Role
Lead Technical Analyst
SME Role
Lead Assurance Analyst
SME User
vaishnsharma@deloitte.co.uk
I0273 Submission Form
I0273 - Update to Plan V2.0 (Pre-Approval) 06.05.2026
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required

Addition of data items to Housing Association and Radio Teleswitch Support Categories in EES

Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
C3-0134
Urgent
No
Latest Update
-
Summary
East Lothian Housing Association (ELHA) is pioneering additional support around Radio Teleswitch (RTS) switch-off not only for its assets, but also across Scotland through the Scottish Federation of Housing Associations (SFHA). It is supporting technical solutions across both the Housing Association category (for its own assets) and for the Radio Teleswitch Support category (for members of the SFHA).
Proposer
Elise Handy
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Date of Update to Priority
Company Name
Code Manager (RPS)
Review status
Review required

Performance Assurance Operating Plan (PAOP) 2025/26

Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
C3-0133
Urgent
No
Latest Update
-
Summary
The Code Manager prepares an annual operating plan setting out the techniques it intends to apply to manage Retail Risks identified within the Retail Risk Register. This plan, referred to as the Performance Assurance Operating Plan (PAOP), sets out the Performance Assurance priorities and is approved and tracked by the PAB. The current updates set out the Performance Assurance Operating Plan for 2025-26. Please note this is a draft version for consultation and it will be updated based on feedback and taken to the August PAB meeting for approval.
Proposer
Vaishnavi Campbell-Sharma
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Date of Update to Priority
Company Name
Code Manager (RPA)
Review status
Review required

Theft Calculator Usage and Suitability Assessment

Date of latest update
Type
Issue
ID
I0265
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
06/05/2026 - The Change Report (Extension to Plan) was approved at Change Panel on 05 May 2026. Solution Requirements are under development.
Summary
Currently, it is uncertain how widely the existing Theft Assessment Calculators are being used by Parties for assessing energy losses due to theft, despite Schedules 7 & 8 mandating the usage. There is evidence to suggest inconsistent application across Parties, and whilst there has only been one derogation request, anecdotal feedback indicates that other Parties are also struggling to use the calculator.
Proposer
Aiyesha Andrade
Change Report - Initial Assessment and Change Plan Report
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed solution summary
  1. It is expected that there will be a collaborative information gathering exercise to thoroughly assess the current Theft Calculator. This includes collecting data on specific use cases, frequency of use, and devices (such as laptops or mobile devices), evaluating whether its current functionalities align with industry needs for assessing energy theft and TDIS submissions, and reviewing the suitability of its current platform to identify preferred future delivery mechanisms (e.g. web or app-based). This approach aims to inform potential enhancements or a comprehensive upgrade, ensuring a consistent and reliable tool that can be accessed and used effectively across multiple operational scenarios and devices for the benefit of all Parties.
Problem Statement
The current lack of clarity around the usage, effectiveness, and suitability of the energy theft calculator is leading to inconsistent assessments and reporting across the industry. This ambiguity hinders the identification and sharing of best practices, creates an uneven playing field among Parties, and may result in inconsistent outcomes for consumers. Additionally, it limits the tool’s potential to support robust, court-ready evidence ahead of the Energy Theft Unit (ETU) and Referral Assessment Service (RAS) launch. A lack of transparency may also discourage Parties from raising concerns, further impeding improvement and compliance.
SME
SME Role
Lead Technical Analyst
SME User
maxime.van-eyseren@capgemini.com
SME Role
Lead Assurance Analyst
SME User
vaishnsharma@deloitte.co.uk
I0265 submission form
I0265_ Change Report (Extension to Plan) V1.0
I0265 Consolidated Information Request Network Responses PUBLIC
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required

Performance Assurance Board (PAB) Procedures V6.0

Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
C3-0132
Urgent
No
Latest Update
-
Summary
The Code Manager has undertaken the annual review of the Performance Assurance Board (PAB) Procedures. Some minor housekeeping updates have been made. This was presented to PAB on 24 June 2025 and was noted.
Proposer
Bailey Robb
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Date of Update to Priority
Company Name
Code Manager (RPA)
Review status
Review required

Code of Practice for Non-Domestic Third-Party Intermediaries

Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
C3-0131
Urgent
No
Latest Update
-
Summary
Amendments to the COP to recognise: - That Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) schemes must be available to both Small and Micro Business customers. - This ADR scheme signposted by the TPI could be one of multiple ADR scheme providers. - The Annual Consumption (introduced by Market-wide Half Hourly Settlement) can be used as accurate consumption data for MHHS migrated MPANs. - Correct terminology. (Energy Supplier rather than Licensee, and Consumer rather than Customer) Updates to Principle 1 to provide clarity on what detail on TPI enumeration should be provided to the Consumer. Updates to the template Letter of Authority to remove the bullet allowing the TPI to sign and enter into new contracts. Text on compliance monitoring has been moved to be included under a new Principle 9.
Proposer
Jonny Moore
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Date of Update to Priority
Company Name
RECCo
Review status
Review required

Addition of Connection Providers to DAM and MHHS Data Items to Existing Categories

Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
C3-0130
Urgent
No
Latest Update
-
Summary
Addition of Connection Providers to DAM: allowing Independent Connection Providers (ICPs) work on behalf of the Distribution Network Operators (DNOs) and Independent Distribution Network Operators (IDNOs) access to certain Data Items in the DAM. Addition of MHHS Data Items to Existing Categories: Demand Flexibility, Electric Vehicle Charging and Third Party (Non Switching)
Proposer
Elise Handy
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Date of Update to Priority
Company Name
Code Manager (RPS)
Review status
Review required

Additional Registration Data (Gas) under Smart Energy Code

Date of latest update
Type
Issue
ID
I0262
Change Category
Other Industry Codes impacted
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
19/06/2026 - Change Report Re-Plan V4.0 approved by Change Panel.
Summary
Gas Transporters (GTs) only have a single obligation in the Smart Energy Code (SEC). This obligation relates to the provision of Registration Data to the DCC. This issue is exploring whether these obligations may be transferred to the REC.
Proposer
Tracey Saunders
Impacted REC Documents
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Problem Statement
Gas Transporters have very few obligations under the Smart Energy Code; those that they do have relate to provision of data owned by the REC. If these obligations were to be moved from the SEC to the REC, then the regulatory burden on GTs may be reduced as they would be able to completely secede from the SEC.
SME
SME Role
Lead Technical Analyst
SME Role
Lead Assurance Analyst
SME User
vaishnsharma@deloitte.co.uk
Change Proposal Submission form
I0262 Change Report (Plan) (Approved) V5.0 19.06.26
I0262 Change Report Re-Plan V4.0 19.06
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required