Explore use of CHECK as a Meter Type option on J0483 DI-059

Date of latest update
Type
Issue
ID
I0344
Other Industry Codes impacted
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
24/08/2026 - accepted in by Code Manager
Summary
It has been suggested that CHECK meters should not be sent within industry messages so the presence of this value within the valid set may not be required. This Issue has been raised to explore whether this assumption is correct, look at the existing/historic use cases industry have used the CHECK option for, if they are no longer valid and if so why not.
Proposer
Holly Law
Impacted REC Documents
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
I0344 submission form
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required

Enabling Dual MSA & MSS (SVA MOA) appointments for WC connection types

Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0342
Other Industry Codes impacted
Urgent
No
Latest Update
13/08/2026 - accepted in by Code Manager
Summary
Under the legacy/pre-MHHS arrangements the market is segmented by Measurement Class (MC) for settlement purposes which is not sensitive to the Meter type that is installed or is to be installed, meaning that the replacement of Traditional meters to either smart or Advanced metering equipment can be arranged without the need for the Change of Measurement Class (CoMC) process to be conducted concurrent with the meter exchange (MEX). Under MHHS, when a WC connection goes through a MEX from Traditional to Advanced, or from Advanced to Smart in the MHHS arrangements a new complexity is placed on suppliers because the CoSeg process must be tightly co-ordinated to a specified planned MEX date and processed through the MPRS within 3 Working Days of that date.
Proposer
Lee Stone
Impacted REC Documents
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
R0342 submission form
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required

Improved Validation for DI51599 - Electricity Smart Meter Equipment (ESME ID)

Date of latest update
Type
Issue
ID
I0341
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
13/08/2026 - accepted in by Code Manager
Summary
A DNO has raised an issue with the ESME ID data stored in MPRS. Some of the ESMEs are passing MPRS basic validation but are being rejected by the proposed Metering Service preventing a change of service.
Proposer
Daniel Tadecicco
Impacted REC Documents
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
I0341 submission form
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required

REC Change to align with BSC CP Clarify Supplier obligations for IF-002 messages where a Switch is cancelled

Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0339
Change Category
Other Industry Codes impacted
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
06/08/2026 - Change Proposal accepted in by Code Manager
Summary
A BSC CP has been raised to clarify Supplier obligations for IF-002 messages where a Switch is cancelled. This obligation is also in REC Schedule 14 Metering Operations, so a REC change is required or the obligation remains in place.
Proposer
Caroline Freimuller
Impacted REC Documents
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
R0339 submission form
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required

REC Change to align with CP1633 Capture Modem Module Details Under BSCP601

Date of latest update
Type
Issue
ID
I0338
Change Category
Other Industry Codes impacted
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
06/08/2026 - Issue accepted in by the Code Manager
Summary
BSC CP1633 “Capture Modem Module Details Under BSCP601” makes amendments to BSCP601 Metering Protocol Approval and Compliance Testing. One of the amendments places obligations on MOAs where they are introducing and amending Communications Equipment. Equivalent and potentially expanded obligations need to be placed within REC Schedule 14 Metering Operations to support this.
Proposer
Lee Walker
Impacted REC Documents
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
I0338 submission form
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required

Change to Location (A0059) data item within the ONAGE APPT file to MAMs, from ‘Optional’ to ‘Mandatory’

Date of latest update
Type
Issue
ID
I0337
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
24/07/2026 - Issue accepted in by Code Manager
Summary
Currently, the location (A0059) data item within the ONAGE APPT file from Suppliers to MAMs is Optional, this allows a Supplier to leave this field blank. Currently SGNCS system functionality is designed to reject the file if this field is blank. This is due to SGNCS requiring to hold the location of the meter installation in order to allow us to deliver on our safety obligations as a MAM in maintaining of an asset.
Proposer
Marc Gasson
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
I0337 submission form
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required

Removal of D0383 & D0384 requirements from Sharing MTDs process

Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0328
Change Category
Other Industry Codes impacted
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
14/08/2026 - the consultation has opened, responses must be received by 23:59 07 September 2026.
Summary
Schedule 14 - Metering Operations currently holds obligations for a Meter Operator Agent (MOA) to send a D0383 ‘Notification of Commissioning Information’ to Electricity Suppliers, Distribution Network Operators (DNOs), Data Services and Data Collectors in certain process steps. The D0383 was not shared with these Parties in legacy arrangements, and there is no requirement for it to be sent to facilitate the MHHS arrangements. There are similar requirements to send the D0384 ‘Notification of Commissioning Status’ to these Parties, when it is only required by the Electricity Supplier. These requirements were introduced by the MHHS Design in error and need to be removed.
Proposer
Harriet Truss
Impacted REC Documents
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Implementation Date
Status Live
EMAR Version 06.11.2026_live
Implementation Status
Date Raised
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
R0328 legal text V0.1
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
Schedule 14 - Metering Operations puts obligations on MOAs which are both not required and impossible to fulfil (as the Scenario Variants to send the D0383 from the MOA to the Electricity Supplier, DNO, Data Service and Data Collector do not exist). There are similar problems for the D0384, which is only required to be sent from the MOA to the Electricity Supplier.
R0328 submission form
R0328 Change Report (Proposal Plan) v1.0 - approved 21.07.26
R0328 Change Report (For Consultation) V1.0 approved 12.08.26
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required

Post-MHHS Full Transition Complete (M15) REC updates

Date of latest update
Type
Issue
ID
I0325
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
21/07/2026 - On 21 July 2026, the REC Change Panel voted to approve the Change Report (Proposal Plan) for I0325.
Summary
The REC was updated, primarily through R0209 and R0241, to add requirements that support the transition to, and enduring operation of the MHHS arrangements. As part of the transition, each impacted Metering Point will be migrated using processes defined in Codes, including the REC. Once this migration activity is complete, the legacy and transitional arrangements will become redundant and should be removed from the REC to support its efficient operation
Proposer
Jonny Moore
Change Report - Initial Assessment and Change Plan Report

Comments deadline
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Problem Statement
Retention of redundant obligations within the REC would make it more complex to navigate for Market Participants and could cause confusion on the obligations that are in effect to support the efficient operation of the Great British Energy retail market. It is also worth noting that until Ofgem formally closes the MHHS Significant Code Review (SCR), this REC Issue could potentially impact that SCR.
SME
SME Role
Lead Technical Analyst
SME Role
Lead Assurance Analyst
I0325 submission form
I0325 Scope list
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required
Schedule 14 - Metering Operations 7.3 – Implemented on
Loading...

Crossed Meters Process: Clarifications and Support

Date of latest update
Type
Issue
ID
I0314
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
12/05/2026 - The Information Request has closed. The Code Manager is curently assessing the responses
Summary
This issue seeks to solve is the gap between the documented REC Crossed Meters process and how it is being applied operationally. The aim is to ensure all parties fully understand the process, apply it consistently, and have the support necessary to achieve timely, correct resolution of Crossed Meter cases.
Proposer
James Hardy
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Lead Analyst
florentina.monea
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
SME
SME Role
Lead Technical Analyst
SME Role
Lead Assurance Analyst
I0314 submission form
I0314 Change Report (Proposal Plan) Approved 21.04.26
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required