Explore use of CHECK as a Meter Type option on J0483 DI-059

Date of latest update
Type
Issue
ID
I0344
Other Industry Codes impacted
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
24/08/2026 - accepted in by Code Manager
Summary
It has been suggested that CHECK meters should not be sent within industry messages so the presence of this value within the valid set may not be required. This Issue has been raised to explore whether this assumption is correct, look at the existing/historic use cases industry have used the CHECK option for, if they are no longer valid and if so why not.
Proposer
Holly Law
Impacted REC Documents
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
I0344 submission form
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required

MSC - Amending Statement Production Timescales

Date of latest update
Type
Issue
ID
I0343
Change Category
Change Path
Urgent
Yes
Latest Update
24/08/2026 The Change Report (Proposal Plan and Consultation) has been issued to Change Panel for ex-Committee decision. The proposed legal text can be found in the solutions section below.
Summary
RECCo is implementing the MSC solution in two phases to enable a swift restart of the MSC scheme, should a decision be made to recommence it. Phase one will enable data collection and the tracking of Supplier liabilities, allowing the scheme to commence before the full solution is available. Phase two will introduce the calculation and financial components.
Proposer
Jenny Bridges
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
I0343 Draft Schedule 22 Market Stabilisation Charge v1.0
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
The REC currently requires statements relating to MSC to be provided to Energy Suppliers within 15 working days of the relevant MSC cycle. However, during the phased implementation of the MSC scheme, this timeframe may not provide sufficient time to reconcile the data collection while the calculation functionality is still under development.
I0343 submission form
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required

Enabling Dual MSA & MSS (SVA MOA) appointments for WC connection types

Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0342
Other Industry Codes impacted
Urgent
No
Latest Update
13/08/2026 - accepted in by Code Manager
Summary
Under the legacy/pre-MHHS arrangements the market is segmented by Measurement Class (MC) for settlement purposes which is not sensitive to the Meter type that is installed or is to be installed, meaning that the replacement of Traditional meters to either smart or Advanced metering equipment can be arranged without the need for the Change of Measurement Class (CoMC) process to be conducted concurrent with the meter exchange (MEX). Under MHHS, when a WC connection goes through a MEX from Traditional to Advanced, or from Advanced to Smart in the MHHS arrangements a new complexity is placed on suppliers because the CoSeg process must be tightly co-ordinated to a specified planned MEX date and processed through the MPRS within 3 Working Days of that date.
Proposer
Lee Stone
Impacted REC Documents
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
R0342 submission form
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required

REC Change to align with BSC CP Clarify Supplier obligations for IF-002 messages where a Switch is cancelled

Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0339
Change Category
Other Industry Codes impacted
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
06/08/2026 - Change Proposal accepted in by Code Manager
Summary
A BSC CP has been raised to clarify Supplier obligations for IF-002 messages where a Switch is cancelled. This obligation is also in REC Schedule 14 Metering Operations, so a REC change is required or the obligation remains in place.
Proposer
Caroline Freimuller
Impacted REC Documents
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
R0339 submission form
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required

Legal text to support REC Change R0180

Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0336
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
20/08/2026 - the consultation is open, responses must be received by 23:59 14 September 2026
Summary
REC Change R0180 “Clarity on use of on hold for switching issues, including the obligations of CSS Users” implements a technical solution for the closure of certain ticket raised to the Switching Operator when no response has been received. This Change Proposal contains the legal text to support R0180.
Proposer
Caroline Freimuller
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Implementation Date
Status Live
EMAR Version 06.11.2026_live
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
R0336 Schedule 26 Switching Service Management - for consultation
Archive
Off
Document title
R0336 Switching Operator (SO) Service Definition - for consultation
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
R0180 Clarity on use of on hold for switching issues, including the obligations of CSS Usersintroduces a technical solution for the closure of certain tickets raised to the Switching Operator when no response has been received. Without supporting legal text, these obligations and expectations are not documented within the REC.
SME
SME Role
Lead Technical Analyst
R0336 submission form
R0336 Change Report (Proposal Plan and Consultation) V1.0
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required

Farooq change proposal 1

Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R10001
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
dsf fdsfdsfdfdfdsf dfdfdsfds
Summary
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Negat esse eam, inquit, propter se expetendam. Primum Theophrasti, Strato, physicum se voluit; Id mihi magnum videtur. Itaque mihi non satis videmini considerare quod iter sit naturae quaeque progressio. Quare hoc videndum est, possitne nobis hoc ratio philosophorum dare. Est enim tanti philosophi tamque nobilis audacter sua decreta defendere.
Proposer
Farooq Ahmad Salmani
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Implementation Date
Status Live
EMAR Version 07.11.2025_live
Included changes Affected REC Items
R0003 Market-wide Half-Hourly Settlement Implementation
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Linked to SDS Delivery
No
Lead Analyst
Jemma Johnson
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed solution summary
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Negat esse eam, inquit, propter se expetendam. Primum Theophrasti, Strato, physicum se voluit; Id mihi magnum videtur. Itaque mihi non satis videmini considerare quod iter sit naturae quaeque progressio. Quare hoc videndum est, possitne nobis hoc ratio philosophorum dare. Est enim tanti philosophi tamque nobilis audacter sua decreta defendere.
Problem Statement
dvdfg gdfgfgfdgdfg
Workgroup
Workgroup(s)
Company Name
Loremipsum
Review status
Review required

Regulatory Alliance Creation Rejections

Date of latest update
Type
Issue
ID
I0331
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
19/08/2026 - the Change Report (Proposal Plan) was approved by Change Panel. The Change Team and Performance Assurance team are working together to determine if there are performance assurance requirements for this change.
Summary
An incident where Network Parties did not submit Regulatory Alliances on time to the Central Switching Service (CSS) Provider, or did submit the Regulatory Alliances but did not action rejections from the CSS Provider in a timely manner, led to over 200 Consumers being delayed in Switching to their chosen Energy Supplier. This Change Proposal has been raised to review this process.
Proposer
abedapatel
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
I0331 Schedule 24 Switching Data Management
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
The lack of Service Level Agreements (SLAs) on Network Parties to submit Regulatory Alliances to the CSS Provider or to work any rejections received from the CSS Provider can lead to delays in Consumers being able to Switch to their chosen Energy Supplier.
SME
SME Role
Lead Assurance Analyst
I0331 submission form
I0331 Change Report (Proposal Plan) V1.0 approved 18.08.26
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required

Removal of D0383 & D0384 requirements from Sharing MTDs process

Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0328
Change Category
Other Industry Codes impacted
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
14/08/2026 - the consultation has opened, responses must be received by 23:59 07 September 2026.
Summary
Schedule 14 - Metering Operations currently holds obligations for a Meter Operator Agent (MOA) to send a D0383 ‘Notification of Commissioning Information’ to Electricity Suppliers, Distribution Network Operators (DNOs), Data Services and Data Collectors in certain process steps. The D0383 was not shared with these Parties in legacy arrangements, and there is no requirement for it to be sent to facilitate the MHHS arrangements. There are similar requirements to send the D0384 ‘Notification of Commissioning Status’ to these Parties, when it is only required by the Electricity Supplier. These requirements were introduced by the MHHS Design in error and need to be removed.
Proposer
Harriet Truss
Impacted REC Documents
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Implementation Date
Status Live
EMAR Version 06.11.2026_live
Implementation Status
Date Raised
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
R0328 legal text V0.1
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
Schedule 14 - Metering Operations puts obligations on MOAs which are both not required and impossible to fulfil (as the Scenario Variants to send the D0383 from the MOA to the Electricity Supplier, DNO, Data Service and Data Collector do not exist). There are similar problems for the D0384, which is only required to be sent from the MOA to the Electricity Supplier.
R0328 submission form
R0328 Change Report (Proposal Plan) v1.0 - approved 21.07.26
R0328 Change Report (For Consultation) V1.0 approved 12.08.26
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required

Provision of Standard industrial Classification (SIC) Code to REC Parties

Date of latest update
Type
Issue
ID
I0327
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
22/05/2026 - Issue accepted in by Code Manager
Summary
As part of the planning required to deliver Net Zero, Gas Distribution Networks (GDNs) are obligated to plan Industrial and Commercial (I&C) gas demand at a more granular, site-specific level. To meet this obligation, access to Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code data, matched to both Gas and Electricity Meter Point Reference Numbers, would provide a significantly improved understanding of I&C customers.
Proposer
Sally Hardman
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
I0327 submission form
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required

Erroneous Switch Review: Assurance Reporting Update

Date of latest update
Type
Issue
ID
I0326
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
07/07/2025 - Change Report (Proposal Plan) has been approved by the REC Change Panel.
Summary
There is gap in the Erroneous Switch (ES) Performance Assurance reporting as the DTN does not provide MPXN level data up front. It requires individual ES permission before MPXNs are provided. However, CSS reporting does provide monthly MPXN level report. As such end-to-end monitoring of the ES process cannot be carried out at a MPXN level.
Proposer
Joy Nnamani
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
REC Decision Maker
Lead Analyst
florentina.monea
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
I0326 submission form
I0326 Change Report (Proposal Plan) (Approved) v1.1 07.07.26
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required