Test Change

Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
CP6168660294
Urgent
No
Latest Update
Empty
Summary
Empty
Proposer
Sagar Agrawal
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed solution summary

sdfdsfsd

Problem Statement
sfdffd
Workgroup
Workgroup(s)
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required

(Alt.) Introduction of Sweet Treat Reward System

Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R9999A
Latest Update
Approved for Implementation
Summary
The REC change process currently relies on formal obligations and voluntary participation to secure stakeholder engagement; however, this approach does not consistently drive timely, high-quality input during key stages such as consultations and working groups. As a result, participation can be delayed, inconsistent, or limited in substance, reducing the effectiveness of impact assessments and slowing overall change delivery.
In the absence of any positive reinforcement mechanisms, the process places full reliance on compliance rather than motivation, which may not fully reflect the human factors influencing engagement. This creates a persistent gap between the intended collaborative nature of the REC and the reality of stakeholder behaviour, ultimately affecting the pace and quality of change outcomes delivered to the market.
Proposer
Neil Brinkley
Date Raised
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed solution summary
To introduce a “Savoury and Sweet Treat Reward System” (SaSTRS), expanding the REC change process to include a balanced, non-financial incentive mechanism offering both savoury and sweet rewards for stakeholder engagement. The change aims to improve participation and the quality of contributions by recognising differing stakeholder preferences, thereby enhancing the effectiveness and timeliness of REC change delivery.
Problem Statement
The REC change process currently relies on formal obligations and voluntary participation to secure stakeholder engagement; however, this approach does not consistently drive timely, high-quality input during key stages such as consultations and working groups. As a result, participation can be delayed, inconsistent, or limited in substance, reducing the effectiveness of impact assessments and slowing overall change delivery.
In the absence of any positive reinforcement mechanisms, the process places full reliance on compliance rather than motivation, which may not fully reflect the human factors influencing engagement. This creates a persistent gap between the intended collaborative nature of the REC and the reality of stakeholder behaviour, ultimately affecting the pace and quality of change outcomes delivered to the market.
Workgroup
Workgroup(s)
Review status
Reviewed - Accepted

Farooq change proposal 1

Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R10001
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
dsf fdsfdsfdfdfdsf dfdfdsfds
Summary
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Negat esse eam, inquit, propter se expetendam. Primum Theophrasti, Strato, physicum se voluit; Id mihi magnum videtur. Itaque mihi non satis videmini considerare quod iter sit naturae quaeque progressio. Quare hoc videndum est, possitne nobis hoc ratio philosophorum dare. Est enim tanti philosophi tamque nobilis audacter sua decreta defendere.
Proposer
Farooq Ahmad Salmani
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Implementation Date
Status Live
EMAR Version 07.11.2025_live
Included changes Affected REC Items
R0003 Market-wide Half-Hourly Settlement Implementation
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Linked to SDS Delivery
No
Lead Analyst
Jemma Johnson
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed solution summary
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Negat esse eam, inquit, propter se expetendam. Primum Theophrasti, Strato, physicum se voluit; Id mihi magnum videtur. Itaque mihi non satis videmini considerare quod iter sit naturae quaeque progressio. Quare hoc videndum est, possitne nobis hoc ratio philosophorum dare. Est enim tanti philosophi tamque nobilis audacter sua decreta defendere.
Problem Statement
dvdfg gdfgfgfdgdfg
Workgroup
Workgroup(s)
Company Name
Loremipsum
Review status
Review required

Introduction of Sweet Treat Reward System

Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R9999
Change Category
Priority
Urgent
Yes
Latest Update
Consultation issued June 29th
Summary
This proposal introduces a formalised “Sweet Treat Reward System” within the REC governance framework, whereby participants are recognised with confectionery based incentives for timely delivery, high quality submissions, and proactive engagement in the change process. The change aims to improve stakeholder participation, reduce consultation fatigue, and enhance overall delivery performance by introducing a light-touch behavioural incentive aligned to existing governance activities.
Proposer
Mark Pearce
Impact Status
Impacted Consumers
Impacted REC Documents
Implementation Date
Status Scheduled
EMAR Version 4.1.0_Live

Documents

Name Version Last updated Actions
317 bytes
Version 1.0 - 08 Jun 2026 PDF - 317 bytes
1.0 08 Jun 2026
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Linked to SDS Delivery
No
Lead Analyst
Dave Jones
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed solution summary
The proposed solution is to introduce a new REC provision establishing a “Sweet Treat Reward System” (STRS), creating a light-touch, non-financial incentive mechanism linked to existing change process activities. This would require updates to REC governance documentation (e.g. Change Management schedule and supporting guidance) to define eligibility criteria, reward thresholds, and roles, with the Code Manager responsible for administering and maintaining the scheme and recording outcomes within the REC Portal. End-to-end, the solution would operate by linking stakeholder behaviours (e.g. timely consultation responses, active participation in CIG discussions, and high-quality submissions) to predefined reward triggers. The REC Portal would be enhanced to capture participation metrics, calculate eligibility, and notify participants of earned rewards via automated communications (e.g. portal notifications or email), with a monthly or milestone-based cadence. Data flows would include submission timestamps, attendance records, and qualitative assessment inputs from the Code Manager or Change Leads, which would be consolidated into a “Reward Eligibility Log” maintained within REC systems. Implementation would be led by the Code Manager, supported by the DSP for system changes and reporting capability, and overseen by REC governance bodies to ensure alignment with existing obligations and neutrality principles. The solution would not alter core decision-making processes but would overlay an engagement-focused mechanism, with clear accountability for administration, auditability of outcomes, and periodic review to ensure continued effectiveness and proportionality.
Problem Statement
The REC change process currently relies on formal obligations and voluntary participation to secure stakeholder engagement; however, this approach does not consistently drive timely, high-quality input during key stages such as consultations and working groups. As a result, participation can be delayed, inconsistent, or limited in substance, reducing the effectiveness of impact assessments and slowing overall change delivery.
In the absence of any positive reinforcement mechanisms, the process places full reliance on compliance rather than motivation, which may not fully reflect the human factors influencing engagement. This creates a persistent gap between the intended collaborative nature of the REC and the reality of stakeholder behaviour, ultimately affecting the pace and quality of change outcomes delivered to the market.
Workgroup
Workgroup(s)
Review status
Reviewed - Accepted

Updates to Schedule 14 Measurement Transformers Commissioning Timescales

Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0284
Change Category
Other Industry Codes impacted
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
12/08/2026 - the Metering Expert Panel approved the Change Report (Final Recommendation) V1.2. This Change Proposal will be implemented on 26 June 2027. If you wish to appeal this decision, this must be received by COB 28 August 2026.
Summary
The current timetables in REC Schedule 14 Metering Operations sections 15.6 and 30.6, where an Electricity Metering Asset requires commissioning in accordance with BSC Metering CoP 4 and the Measurement Transformers are owned by the DNO, or in 15.7 and 30.7 where the Measurement Transformers are not owned by the DNO, may no longer be fit for purpose post the implementation of MHHS Milestone M16, where the Settlement timetable reduces the RF run to 4 months.
Proposer
Caroline Freimuller
Change Report - Initial Assessment and Change Plan Report

Comments deadline
Change Report - Draft Change Report
Impacted REC Documents
Status
Implementation Date
Status Live
EMAR Version 25.06.2027_live
Implementation Status
Date Raised
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
I0284 Schedule 14 Metering Operations draft V0.2
Archive
Off
Document title
R0284 Schedule 14 Metering Operations draft V0.3
Archive
Off
Document title
R0284 Schedule 14 Metering Operations final version
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
The current timetables in REC Schedule 14 Metering Operations sections 15.6 and 30.6, where an Electricity Metering Asset requires commissioning in accordance with BSC Metering CoP 4 and the Measurement Transformers are owned by the DNO, or in 15.7 and 30.7 where the Measurement Transformers are not owned by the DNO, may no longer be fit for purpose post the implementation of MHHS Milestone M16, where the Settlement timetable reduces the RF run to 4 months.
I0284 submission form
I0284 Change Report (Proposal Plan) V1.0 approved 03.02.26
I0284 Change Issue Group paper v1.0
I0284 Consolidated Impact Assessment Responses PUBLIC v1.0
R0284 Change Report (For Consultation) V1.0 approved 08.04.26
R0284 Consolidated Consultation Responses PUBLIC v1.0
R0284 Change Report (Final Recommendation) V1.2 approved 12.08.26
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required