Establishing the Safe Isolation Provider (SIP) as a Standalone REC Party
Date of latest update
Type
Issue
ID
I0278
Change Category
Other Industry Codes impacted
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
21/07/2026 - An Update to Plan has been approved by the Change Panel on 21 July 2026.
Summary
This proposal recommends the formal recognition of the Safe Isolation Provider (SIP) as a standalone Party under the Retail Energy Code (REC). This aligns with the direction set out in Ofgem’s recently published Strategic Direction Statement (SDS), which explicitly calls for the establishment of SIPs as a standalone Party role. The aim is to address the growing scale of unregulated SIP activity, mitigate associated consumer safety risks, and ensure the metering industry is equipped to support the UK’s Net Zero ambitions. By enabling easier access to certified SIPs, this change will enhance consumer protection, accelerate low-carbon technology deployment, and improve operational efficiency across the energy sector.
Impacted REC Documents
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Problem Statement
The current SIP framework poses several risks: - Consumers, MEMs and unaccredited practitioners’ safety. Unaccredited and unregulated isolation work increases the risk of unsafe installations and potential harm to Consumers. NAPIT highlighted to RECCo and DESNZ that 17 and 13 unregulated practitioners respectively died in 2023 and in 2024 due to unsafe isolation. With the right Party undertaking this work, there would also be less safety issues for the Consumer at their premises; - Inequity. Independent Installers face longer wait times compared to supplier-led installations, creating a two-tier system; - Low competitive market. Currently prospective Parties can be put off from applying to be a SIP as it appears they would need full MEM Accreditation which is often too far outside their current business operating model. Providing SIPs with their own pathway and requirements could result in more Parties becoming SIPs and therefore giving Consumers more choice in their provider; and - Decarbonisation delays. The inability to scale SIP capacity undermines the timely deployment of LZCTs, threatening Net Zero targets.
Stages Selection
Stages Selection
SME
SME Role
Lead Technical Analyst
SME Role
Lead Assurance Analyst
SME User
amoden@deloitte.co.uk
I0278 submission form
I0278 Change Report (Proposal Plan) V1.0 (Pre-Approval) 09.10.2025
I0278_Change Report (Extension to Plan) v1.0 (Pre-Approval) 12.01.2026
I0278_Change Report (Extension to Plan) v2.0 (Pre-Approval) 13.07.2026
I0278_Change Report (Extension to Plan) v2.1 (Approved) 21.07.26
I0278_Consolidated Information Request DNO Responses
I0278_Consolidated Information Request MEM-SIP Responses PUBLIC
I0278_Consolidated Information Request RPA Responses
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required
Data Latency SLA Alignment for Gas Enquiry Service
Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0277
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
This Change Proposal has been implemented as part of the February 2026 REC Release.
Summary
The current performance level for the processing of Data from CDSP is no longer fit for purpose and does not reflect the operational capability of the service. The performance level was originally conceived as part of the CSS programme in 2022 and operational reality has shown it is not required by industry. A revision of the performance level will align service performance metrics with system performance and deliver economic benefit.
Change Plan
Proposal Plan approved at Change Panel
Completed
Start:
Due:
Completion:
07 Oct 2025Impacted REC Services
Status
Implementation Date
27 February 2026
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
R0277 Legal Text For Consultation
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
The current performance levels for the processing of data from CDSP is no longer fit for purpose and does not align with system or service performance. The CSDP is also not meeting these performance levels on a monthly basis. While there are no known issues on data latency raised by users, this change to clarify performance levels is needed for the GES reinstated contract and to ensure ongoing service delivery.
Stages Selection
SME
SME Role
Lead Technical Analyst
SME Role
Lead Assurance Analyst
I0277 submission form
I0277 Change Report (Proposal Plan) approved 07/10/2025
R0277 Change Report (For Consultation) v1.0
R0277 Change Report (Final Recommendation) Approved 26.11.25 v1.0
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required
MHHS Related Metering Points across Market Segments
Date of latest update
Type
Issue
ID
I0275
Change Category
Other Industry Codes impacted
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
06/11/2025 - Following discussions at the Change Issues Group on 06 November, a REC guidance will be developed to support the resolution of this Issue after which it will be classed as resolved.
Summary
It has been identified by the MHHS Data Cleanse Working Group (DCWG) that around 9,000 existing Metering Point Relationships include Metering Points that would migrate into different Market-wide Half Hourly Settlement (MHHS) Market Segments. The majority of these are where one Metering Point has a Traditional meter installed (Smart Segment) and a Related Metering Point has an Advanced meter (Advanced Segment). This situation is currently valid but in MHHS would cause two problems. - SMRS would not be able to align the agent appointments, leaving secondary MPANs without agents and MHHS Migrations unable to fully complete.
Impacted REC Documents
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Problem Statement
Without considering this Issue, there will be a risk to the MHHS migration. Indeed, a Metering Point installed which does not match its Related Metering Point (for example a Relationship between a Traditional meter with an Advanced Meter) will not be able to fully migrate to MHHS arrangements.
Stages Selection
Stages Selection
I0275 submission form
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required
Enabling transparency of the CRS Provider’s REC service level performance
Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0272
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
This Change Proposal has been implemented as part of the February 2026 REC Release.
Summary
RECCo regularly reports on the performance of REC Service Providers in relation to their activities under the REC. However, there is currently no formal agreement to permit the publication of CRS performance measures between the CRS Provider and RECCo. Due to the multi-Party agreement, the REC does not specifically address the publication of this performance data. Instead, RECCo are operating under an informal understanding with the CRS Provider, which means there is a possibility that publication may be delayed or not agreed to in a given month. RECCo is dependent on the CRS Provider’s approval for each publication, which can cause delays. This approval could also be withheld at any point.
Impacted REC Documents
Impacted REC Services
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Status
Implementation Date
27 February 2026
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed solution summary
- An update to the REC Schedule 6 – Performance Assurance.
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
R0272 Approved legal text (26.01.2026)
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
Unlike REC Service Providers, there is currently no formal agreement in place between the CRS Provider and RECCo to publish details about the CRS Provider’s performance. RECCo is therefore dependent on the CRS Provider’s approval for each publication. Not only could there be delays in RECCo’s reporting, but the approval could also be withheld at any point, preventing RECCo’s reporting.
Stages Selection
SME
SME Role
Lead Technical Analyst
SME Role
Lead Assurance Analyst
SME User
vaishnsharma@deloitte.co.uk
I0272 Change Proposal Form
R0272 Consolidated Consultation responses V1.0
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required
Clarification of ASP, AMI, and EMO Accession Requirements
Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0271
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
This Change Proposal has been implemented as part of the February 2026 REC Release.
Summary
Schedule 15 - Metering Accreditation is explicit that Meter Operator Agents (MOAs) and Meter Asset Managers (MAMs) need to accede to the Retail Energy Code (REC), but is not explicit on whether Automated Meter Reading (AMR) Service Providers (ASPs), Approved Meter Installers (AMIs), and Electricity Metering Operatives (EMOs) need to accede to the Code.
Change Plan
Proposal Plan approved at Change Panel
Completed
Start:
Due:
Completion:
16 Sep 2025Status
Implementation Date
27 February 2026
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
R0271 Legal Text For Consultation
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
There is a lack of clarity in the Code as to whether ASPs, AMIs, and EMOs need to accede to the REC, meaning these companies may not sure be of their REC obligations.
Stages Selection
SME
SME Role
Lead Assurance Analyst
SME User
vaishnsharma@deloitte.co.uk
I0271 Submission form
I0271 Change Report (Proposal Plan) v1.0 approved 16/09/2025
R0271 Change Report (For Consultation) v1.0
R0271 Change Report (For Consultation) Pre-Approval
R0271 Change Report (Final Recommendation) Approved 12.11.2025 v1.0
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required
Clarification of SIP Qualification Requirements
Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0270
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
This Change Proposal has been implemented as part of the February 2026 REC Release.
Summary
REC Schedules 1, 14, and 15 all note that in order to Qualify as a Safe Isolation Provider (SIP), the Party needs to be a Qualified Meter Operator Agent (MOA). It has since been determined that Qualified Electricity Metering Operatives (EMOs) should also be able to Qualify as SIPs.
Impacted REC Documents
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Status
Implementation Date
27 February 2026
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
I0270 draft legal text
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
Requiring SIPs to be fully Qualified MOAs may be hindering smaller Parties who wish to be SIPs from Qualifying under the REC. This in turn may be reducing the number of Qualified SIPs in the market for Consumers to choose from or causing Consumers inadvertently to contract with people who are not Qualified SIPs to carry out SIP Works.
Stages Selection
SME
SME Role
Lead Assurance Analyst
SME User
amoden@deloitte.co.uk
I0270 Submission Form
I0270 Change Report (Proposal Plan) V1.0 approved 18.11.25
R0270 Change Report (For Consultation) V1.1 approved 10.12.25
R0270 Consolidated Consultation Responses V1.0
R0270 Change Report (Final Recommendation) V1.0 approved 11.02.26
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required
Schedule 5 – Change Management: Clarity and Typographical Review
Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0269
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
This Change Proposal was implemented as part of the 7 November 2025 REC Release.
Summary
Following the implementation of R0167 and the introduction of the REC Issues process, the Code Manager has identified several opportunities to improve clarity, and correct typographical issues, in Schedule 5 – Change Management relating to the Issue and Change Proposal processes. This Change Proposal has been raised to enhance clarity for REC Parties Additionally, key terms—such as the updated titles of Change Reports (e.g., Change Report (Proposal Plan))—should be included in Schedule 5 and defined in Schedule 1 – Interpretations and Definitions.
Status
Implementation Date
07 November 2025
| Included changes | Affected REC Items | |
|---|---|---|
| R0003 | Market-wide Half-Hourly Settlement Implementation |
Implementation Status
Date Raised
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Problem Statement
The Code Manager has identified several inaccuracies and areas of ambiguity within Schedule 5 – Change Management. These issues have led to confusion for both the Code Manager and REC Parties, and in some cases, have resulted in procedural inefficiencies and unnecessary burdens on Sub-Committees.
Stages Selection
R0269 - Change Management v3.7 Draft (for consultation - 21.08.2025).docx
R0269 -Draft Schedule 1 changes (for consultation - 21.08.2025).docx
R0269 Change Proposal Form
R0269 Change Report (For Consultation) V1.0
R0269 Consolidated Consultation Responses V1.0
R0269 Change Report (Final Recommendation) V2.0 (Approved) 07.10.2025
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required
Consequential Cross-Code Change for BSC P441 - Complex Site Classes Creation
Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0268
Change Category
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
12/03/2026 - this Change Proposal is with the Authority for decision.
Summary
The Balancing and Settlement Code (BSC) modification P441 is looking to introduce Complex Site classes which would categorise the types of Complex Site with each having clearly defined criteria within the BSC whilst also facilitating a new "type" of Complex Site (referred to as a Class 6 Complex Site) to allow approval of "non-standard" Complex Sites. It will also clarify when the netting of Imports from Exports for multiple Metering Systems registered in Supplier Volume Allocation (SVA) is permitted.
Change Plan
Change Report (Proposal Plan) approved by Change Panel
Completed
Start:
Due:
Completion:
21 Oct 2025Status
Implementation Date
06 November 2026
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
R0268 Metering Operations v0.1 draft
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
The introduction of new Complex Site classes is needed into the REC to facilitate the solutions under BSC P441 and DCP 424.
Stages Selection
I0268 Submission Form
I0268 Change Report (Proposal Plan) V1.1 approved 21.10.25
R0268 Change Report (For Consultation) V1.0
R0268 Consolidated Consultation responses V1.0
R0268 Extension to Plan V1.0
R0268 Change Report Final Recommendation V1.0 post vote
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required
Smart Meter Installation Surveys - Microbusiness requirements
Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0267
Change Category
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
This Change Proposal has been implemented as part of the June 2026 REC Release.
Summary
There is no requirement for energy suppliers planning fewer than 5000 Smart meter installations at domestic premises, within a calendar year, to survey Consumers for REC compliance purposes. Conversely, there is no minimum threshold in place for microbusiness installations, meaning that non-domestic suppliers are required to procure a suitably qualified, independent Smart Meter Installation Survey Organisation, at considerable cost, to survey what might be a very small number of customers.
Change Plan
Change Report (Proposal Plan) approved by Change Panel
Completed
Start:
Due:
Completion:
19 Aug 2025Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Status
Implementation Date
26 June 2026
| Included changes | Affected REC Items | |
|---|---|---|
| R0103 | Central provision of DCC Technical Contacts for requesting test certificates |
|
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
I0267 CoMCoP Appendix 20 draft V0.1
Archive
Off
Document title
R0267 CoMCoP Appendix 20 draft V0.2
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
Non-Domestic Energy Suppliers are having to procure an independent Smart Meter Installation Survey Organisation, at considerable cost, to survey what might be a very small number of Consumers to be compliant with their REC obligations.
Stages Selection
SME
SME Role
Lead Assurance Analyst
SME User
amoden@deloitte.co.uk
I0267 Submission form
I0267 Change Report (Proposal Plan) V1.1
I0267 Extension to Plan V1.0
I0267 Consolidated Impact Assessment Responses PUBLIC v1.0
R0267 Change Report (For Consultation) V1.0
R0267 Consolidated Consultation Responses PUBLIC v1.0
R0267 Change Report (Final Recommendation) V1.0 approved 07.04.26
R0267 Decision Document
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required
REC Data Specification Clarifications
Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0266
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
07/04/2026 - the REC Change Panel voted to approve this Change Proposal for implementation on 06 November 2026. The appeal window has closed.
Summary
This issue has been raised to improve the clarity of elements of the Energy Market Data Specification (EMDS) that are ambiguous due to information from the pre-REC Data Transfer Catalogue (DTC) Annex C and gas RGMA Annex B being omitted in the transition to REC.
Change Plan
Change Report (Proposal Plan) approved by Change Panel
Completed
Start:
Due:
Completion:
19 Aug 2025Status
Status
Implementation Date
06 November 2026
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
I0266 Party IA documents for gas
Archive
Off
Document title
R0266 consultation documents for gas
Archive
Off
Document title
R0266 final solution documents for gas
Archive
Off
Document title
I0266 Party IA documents for electricity
Archive
Off
Document title
R0266 final solution documents for electricity
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
There may be a lack of clarity for Parties populating Market Messages / Data Flows as not all of the additional rules, conditions and examples from Annex B and Annex C transitioned into the REC (or to another industry code).
Stages Selection
Workgroup
Workgroup(s)
I0266 REC Data Specification Clarifications Submission Form
I0266 Change Report (Proposal Plan) V1.0
I0266 Consolidated Impact Assessment Responses V1.0
I0266 Extension to Plan V1.0 approved 10.12.25
R0266 Change Report (For Consultation) V1.0
R0266 Consolidated Consultation Responses PUBLIC V1.0
R0266 Change Report (Final Recommendation) V1.0 approved 07.04.26
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required