Introduction of CSS refresh functionality
Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0067
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
06/12/2023- This Change was implemented as part of the 6 December 2023 Extraordinary Release
Summary
CSS Market Messages sent by the Central Switching Service (CSS) to Switching Data Service Providers (SDSP) are either not being received, being received after Gate Closure, or are being received out of the order that they were originally sent in. This Change Proposal seeks to introduce a refresh functionality to mitigate these issues.
Change Plan
Solution Analysis and Development
Completed
Start:
29 Aug 2022Due:
19 Oct 2022Completion:
19 Oct 2022Service Provider Impact Assessment
Completed
Start:
19 Oct 2022Due:
29 Mar 2023Completion:
29 Mar 2023Consultation
Completed
Start:
11 Apr 2023Due:
09 May 2023Completion:
28 Apr 2023Preliminary Change Report Issued
Completed
Start:
29 Mar 2023Due:
11 Apr 2023Completion:
05 Apr 2023Final Change Report Issued
Completed
Start:
Due:
Completion:
21 Jun 2023Responsible Committee Decision
Completed
Start:
09 May 2023Due:
28 Jun 2023Completion:
28 Jul 2023Impacted Consumers
Impacted REC Services
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Implementation Date
06 December 2023
| Included changes | Affected REC Items | |
|---|---|---|
| R0106 | Performance Assurance Report Catalogue V5.1 |
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed solution summary
- As a Consumer, I want the Switching process to work successfully, so that I can switch Energy Supplier without delays or issues.
- As the CSS Provider I want the messages I send to SDSPs to be received and processed successfully, so that there is no interruption to the Switching process or the Consumers’ Switching experience. As the CSS Provider, I want the functionality to be available for SDSPs to automatically resolve issues when messages are not received in the correct order or are received after Gate Closure, so that this work does not have to be done manually.
- As an SDSP, I want to be able to detect when I have not received the expected CSS messages, so that I am able to request that the missing messages are sent to me to process. As an SDSP I want to be able to request a refresh of CSS messages when they are not received in the correct order or they are received after Gate Closure, so that I am able to maintain an accurate reflection of the current Switch status and minimise impacts on CSS Users and Consumers.
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
R0067 - Legal Text at PCR
Archive
Off
Document title
R0067 - Legal Text at FCR
Archive
Off
Document title
R0067 - Cost Benefit Analysis and Conclusions v3.0
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
CSS messages not received by the SDSPs in the order they were sent or received, or after Gate Closure, can be difficult to detect and often require significant manual effort to resolve. This issue can directly impact Consumer switching experiences causing disruption and possible delays.
Stages Selection
SME
SME Role
Lead Technical Analyst
R0067 - Change Proposal Form
R0067 - Consolidated Consultation Responses
R0067 - Change Proposal Plan v1.0
R0067 - Initial Assessment Report v1.0
R0067 - Change Proposal Plan v2.0 (Approved) 07.03.2023
R0067 - Change Proposal Plan v3.0 04.04.2023
R0067 - Preliminary Change Report v2.0 (Issued for Consultation) 14.04.2023
R0067 - Final Change Report (Post-Vote) 28.06.2023
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required
Resolution of invalid CSS data by Data Owners
Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0061
Change Category
Other Industry Codes impacted
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
04 March 2024 - Change has been withdrawn following implementation of a solution outside of the REC Change Process. 10WD window to adopt change will close on 18 March 2024.
Summary
Data is sent via the Supplier or MEM to update MPRS, which is then sent to CSS. If the data is considered invalid at CSS, an error is returned to MPRS. MPRS is the conduit of data from the Suppliers & MEMs to CSS, and ERDAs are not responsible for the data, therefore only the supplier/MEM can correct the data. The incidents must be put on hold until the owner of the data corrects the issue, this is to prevent SLA breaches. SLAs does not apply to the Supplier/MEM explicitly, so the incidents remain in the DNOs/IDNOs queue with the need to chase every few days to prevent the incident being closed. The responsibility for the incidents should be on the data owners (Suppliers/MEMs).
Change Plan
Solution Analysis and Development
Completed
Start:
22 Aug 2022Due:
15 Aug 2023Completion:
15 Aug 2023Service Provider Impact Assessment Due
Completed
Start:
15 Aug 2023Due:
19 Oct 2023Completion:
19 Oct 2023Impacted Consumers
Impacted REC Documents
Impacted REC Services
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed solution summary
- As a Consumer, I want data relating to my energy supply to be accurate, so that I can have a consistent and faultless switching experience. As a Consumer, I want any data issues related to my switch to be resolved quickly and by the party responsible, to ensure a fast and efficient switching experience.
- As a DNO, I want my service level requirements to be reflective of my data ownership responsibilities, so that data queries can be resolved more efficiently. As the CSS Service Desk provider, I want my tickets to be allocated to the most appropriate party able to resolve them.
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
R0061 Solution - Service Desk Guidance Article
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
DNO/iDNOs are obligated to resolve data mismatches identified by the CSS during the switch process. However, they are unable to do so in cases where the Supplier/MEM owns data required to resolve the mismatch. Tickets assigned to the DNO (via MPRS) are therefore not going to the party best placed to resolve them, resulting in DNOs chasing the incident resolution every few days to prevent them being closed incorrectly.
Stages Selection
SME
SME Role
Lead Technical Analyst
R0061 - Change Proposal Form
R0061 - Initial Assessment Report v1.0 (Approved) - 18.07.2023
R0061 - Change Proposal Plan v1.0 (Approved) - 18.07.2023
R0061 Change Proposal Re-Plan (Approved) v1.0 - 19.10.23
Company Name
St Clements Services
Review status
Review required
Clarification of Supplier of Last Resort Obligations under the REC
Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0057
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
04/08/2023 - Change Proposal has been withdrawn as agreed with the Proposer. The Problem Statement was addressed through C3-0047 - Updates to PAB Procedures.
Summary
Within Schedule 19 – Market Exit and Supplier of Last Resort there is currently no consideration of circumstances where the Replacement Supplier is unable to fulfil its REC obligations in respect of Consumers transferred to them, due to them having little or no control over the processes of the failed supplier or it’s administrator. This change seeks to define when the Replacement Supplier is responsible for obligations relating to the Consumers gained through a Supplier of Last Resort (SoLR) Process.
Impacted Consumers
Impacted REC Documents
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed solution summary
- As a Consumer when my Energy Supplier goes out of business and I am transferred to a Replacement Supplier, I want my supply transfer to be handled quickly and have confidence that my new Supplier has all the necessary data to set up my account and bill me correctly from the transfer date, and if the Replacement Supplier fails to provide the expected level of service they will be appropriately held accountable.
- As a Replacement Supplier, I want the limitations affecting my ability to meet my REC obligations to be understood by the REC Code Manager and the Performance Assurance Board, so that any breaches of obligations are considered fairly and any limitations are taken into consideration.
- As the Code Manager I want to apply appropriate and proportionate Performance Assurance Techniques, taking in to account the ability of a Replacement Supplier to meet their obligations under the REC.
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
R0057 Draft Legal Text
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
Currently, Replacement Suppliers are responsible for all obligations of the failed supplier from the date and time set out in the Last Resort Supply Direction, this includes a period of time prior to Consumer accounts transferring to the Replacement Supplier’s systems, limiting their ability to fulfil these obligations. This means that a Replacement Supplier may experience issues with the Performance Assurance obligations for which they are responsible, but do not have direct control over. Any breaches of obligations by a Replacement Supplier need to be considered fairly and any limitations the Replacement Supplier may face are taken into consideration.
Stages Selection
R0057 - Change Proposal Form
R0057 - Solution Options
R0057 - Consolidated Impact Assessment Responses
R0057 - Change Proposal Plan v1.0
R0057 - Initial Assessment Report v1.0 (Approved)
R0057 - Preliminary Change Report V1.0 (Approved)
Company Name
EDF
Review status
Review required
EES/GES Additional Service Request for Housing Associations to be added to the Data Access Matrix
Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0056
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
21/11/24 - Change Proposal withdrawn.
Summary
Housing Associations need to validate supply point information to ensure that they have the most up to date and accurate data against each property in their portfolio and also to complement their internal safety inspection processes. This change has been raised to enable Housing Associations to have access to data in EES and GES, to understand and confirm which of their properties contain live supply points, the meter locations, asset data and last inspection checks. This will also enable Housing Associations to update the industry where gas safety information is not accurate against their site data.
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Stages Selection
HA REC Requested Data Items.xlsx
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required
Switching Operator Outage Notification Lead time
Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0055
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
30/11/2022 - The REC Technical Expert Panel voted to approve R0055 for implementation on 24 February 2023.
Summary
Within the Switching Operator Service Definition, the Central Switching Service (CSS) Provider is required to provide 10 Working Days’ (WDs) notice of planned system outages. However, within the CSS Provider’s processes and the Switching Operator Change Management Process Category 3 document, an 8 WD lead time is set out. This change seeks to address this discrepancy.
Change Plan
Service Provider Impact Assessment
Completed
Start:
06 Jul 2022Due:
19 Aug 2022Completion:
19 Sep 2022Party Impact Assessment
Completed
Start:
19 Aug 2022Due:
26 Aug 2022Completion:
13 Sep 2022Preliminary Change Report Issued
Completed
Start:
26 Aug 2022Due:
14 Oct 2022Completion:
14 Oct 2022Consultation Issued
Completed
Start:
14 Oct 2022Due:
14 Oct 2022Completion:
14 Oct 2022Final Change Report Issued
Completed
Start:
14 Oct 2022Due:
18 Nov 2022Completion:
18 Nov 2022Responsible Committee Decision
Not Started
Start:
18 Nov 2022Due:
30 Nov 2022Completion:
Status
Implementation Date
24 February 2023
| Included changes | Affected REC Items | |
|---|---|---|
| R0130 | Updates to the Data Access Matrix |
|
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed solution summary
- As the CSS Provider, I want the service levels to be consistently defined across relevant REC Products. This will ensure that I am clear on the lead time I need to provide for planned outages and can meet the defined service level.
- As a CSS User, I want to understand how much notice I will get for planned outages of the CSS, so I am able to appropriately plan my activity reliant on this service.
- As a Switching Data Service Provider, I want to understand how much notice I will get for planned outages of the CSS. This will ensure I am able to appropriately plan my Operational Switching Service Changes and associated activities.
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
R0055 - Proposed Legal Text
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
Across REC products there is an inconsistency in the defined lead time for the CSS Provider to provide notification of scheduled maintenance and system outages. This may result in uncertainty for Switching Data Service Providers around when they should submit an Operational Switching Service Change. This is to ensure there is sufficient lead time for any change to be included within a planned maintenance release, and for CSS Users planning their operational activity around CSS availability.
Stages Selection
SME
SME Role
Lead Technical Analyst
SME User
beth.brown@capgemini.com
R0055 - Change Proposal Plan v1.0 (Approved)
R0055 - Initial Assessment Report v1.0 (Approved)
R0055 - Consolidated Consultation Responses
R0055 - Preliminary Change Report (Published for Consultation) v1.0
R0055 - Final Change Report v1.0 (Approved)
Company Name
DCC
Review status
Review required
EES Access for Virtual Lead Parties
Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0054
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
03/04/2023 - The Data Access Matrix changes went live on 04 November 2022, the technical changes to EES were implemented alongside R0022 on 03 April 2023.
Summary
This Change Proposal seeks to allow Virtual Lead Parties (VLP) access to the Electricity Enquiry Service (EES), to allow them to efficiently register their customers for balancing services under the Balancing and Settlement Code (BSC).
Change Plan
Service Provider Impact Assessment
Completed
Start:
17 Jun 2022Due:
22 Jul 2022Completion:
22 Aug 2022Preliminary Change Report Issued
Completed
Start:
22 Jul 2022Due:
02 Sep 2022Completion:
02 Sep 2022Consultation Issued
Completed
Start:
02 Sep 2022Due:
02 Sep 2022Completion:
02 Sep 2022Consultation Complete
Completed
Start:
02 Sep 2022Due:
16 Sep 2022Completion:
16 Sep 2022Final Change Report Issued
Completed
Start:
16 Sep 2022Due:
14 Oct 2022Completion:
14 Oct 2022Responsible Committee Decision
Completed
Start:
14 Oct 2022Due:
26 Oct 2022Completion:
26 Oct 2022Impacted Consumers
Impacted REC Documents
Impacted REC Services
Status
Implementation Date
01 April 2023
| Included changes | Affected REC Items | |
|---|---|---|
| R0100 | Update to Error Handling Documents |
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed solution summary
- As an Energy Consumer, I want my VLP to have access to the data needed to correctly register me in a timely manner, so there aren’t delays in the delivery of my service.
- As a VLP, I want to have access to all the data I need to register my customers so I can deliver the service they have requested, without delay.
- As a VLP, I want to be able to use the EES to find the MPAN of a customer using their address information, to enable me to reliably gather this data to without delay or further engagement with my customer.
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
R0054 - Draft DAM Change
Archive
Off
Document title
R0054 - Draft Legal Text
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
VLPs are required to provide their customer’s MPAN as part of the registration process, as per the Balancing and Settlement Code (BSC). VLPs do not currently have access to the EES to enable an MPAN search and they have no reliable means to acquire the MPAN, other than asking their customer to provide it. This could potentially lead to delays in the registration process and may result in an increased risk of inaccurate data, detrimentally impacting the service VLPs are able to provide to their customers.
Stages Selection
R0054 - Initial Assessment Report v1.0 (Approved)
R0054 - Change Proposal Plan v1.0 (Approved)
R0054 - Preliminary Change Report v1.0 (Published for Consultation)
R0054 - Non-Confidential Consultation Responses
R0054 - Final Change Report v2.0
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required
GES Service Definition Document
Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0052
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
30/11/2022 - The REC Technical Expert Panel voted to APPROVE R0052 for implementation on 24 February 2023.
Summary
The frequency of certain reports detailed in the Gas Enquiry Service (GES) Definition document are not consistent with the frequencies set out during the development of REC v3.0 and consulted on with industry stakeholders. This change seeks to align the reporting defined within the Service Definition with the originally intended timetable.
Change Plan
Party Impact Assessment
Completed
Start:
13 Jun 2022Due:
09 Sep 2022Completion:
23 Sep 2022Preliminary Change Report Issued
Completed
Start:
09 Sep 2022Due:
21 Oct 2022Completion:
21 Oct 2022Consultation Issued
Completed
Start:
21 Oct 2022Due:
21 Oct 2022Completion:
21 Oct 2022Final Change Report Issued
In Progress
Start:
21 Oct 2022Due:
18 Nov 2022Completion:
Responsible Committee Decision
Not Started
Start:
18 Nov 2022Due:
30 Nov 2022Completion:
Impacted Consumers
Impacted REC Services
Status
Implementation Date
24 February 2023
| Included changes | Affected REC Items | |
|---|---|---|
| R0130 | Updates to the Data Access Matrix |
|
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed solution summary
- As a Meter Asset Provider (MAP), I want it to be clear how and when I will receive reports relating to my portfolio, to ensure that I have the data required to operate efficiently.
- As a Meter Equipment Manager (MEM), I want it to be clear how and when I will receive reports relating to my portfolio, to ensure that I have the data required to operate efficiently.
- As the GES Service Provider, I want to have clearly and correctly defined requirements and responsibilities, to enable me to efficiently carry out my function as a REC Service Provider.
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
R0052 - Redlined Gas Enquiry Service Definition Document
Archive
Off
Document title
R0052 - EMAR Change Sets
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
The Frequency of reports set out in the Gas Enquiry Service Definition document does not currently reflect the expected frequency for the ‘Supplier Registration report (MEM)’, ‘Portfolio Data (MEM)’ and ‘Portfolio Data (MAP)’ reports. The Gas Enquiry Service Definition needs to be amended to ensure that Meter Equipment Managers (MEMs) and Meter Asset Providers (MAPs) receive reports in the correct timeframe.
Stages Selection
R0052 - Proposed legal text submitted with CP
R0052 - Change Proposal Form v1.0
R0052 - Change Proposal Plan v1.0 (Approved)
R0052 - Initial Assessment Report v1.1 (Approved)
R0052 - Preliminary Change Report v1.0 (Published for Consultation)
R0052 - Consolidated Consultation Responses v1.0
R0052 - Final Change Report v1.0 (Approved)
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required
DCC Service Organisation Control 2 (SOC2) Assessments
Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0048
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
26/06/2024 - The Technical Expert Panel have rejected R0048 in line with the Code Manager's recommendation.
Summary
Currently within the Central Switching Service (CSS) Service Definition document there is a requirement for the CSS Provider to arrange for and undertake system organisation control type 2 (SOC2) assessments on the CSS’s cloud-based infrastructure. This Change Proposal seeks to determine if it is appropriate for the requirement for assurance on the CSS’s cloud-based infrastructure to be changed from ‘SOC2 Type 2’ to ‘independently assessed’.
Change Plan
Service Provider Impact Assessment
Completed
Start:
20 May 2022Due:
16 Jan 2023Completion:
08 Feb 2023Solution Development
In Progress
Start:
16 Jan 2023Due:
24 Nov 2023Completion:
Impacted REC Services
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed solution summary
- As the Code Manager, I want REC Service Providers to obtain and maintain appropriate security certification, so I have confidence that the Service Providers security, processing integrity, confidentiality and privacy controls are assessed, and any risks are identified and addressed.
- As the CSS Provider, I want to be able to obtain an appropriate security certification, so I can demonstrate security compliance in a proportionate and cost-effective approach.
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
Central Switching Service (CSS) Definition - R0048 Redlined
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
The CSS Provider asserts that SOC2 assessment does not provide a proportionate level of assurance or the best value for money, which based on their experience, they believe they have a better understanding of the CSS’s risk profile. However, the use of SOC2 assessments is currently defined within the CSS Definition document, which means an alternative assurance regime cannot be used.
Stages Selection
R0048 - Change Proposal Form
R0048 - Change Proposal Plan v5.0 (Approved) 11.07.2023
R0048 - Initial Assessment Report v1.0 (Approved)
R0048 Preliminary Change Report v1.0 (Approved)
R0048 Consolidated Consultation Responses v1.0
R0048 Final Change Report Post Vote v1.0
Company Name
DCC
Review status
Review required
Changes to SDEP Messages and Schedule numbering for REC V3.0
Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0045
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
Yes
Latest Update
_
Summary
_
Change Plan
Preliminary Change Report issued
Completed
Start:
05 May 2022Due:
27 May 2022Completion:
27 May 2022Consultation Issued
Completed
Start:
27 May 2022Due:
27 May 2022Completion:
27 May 2022Consultation closure
Completed
Start:
27 May 2022Due:
14 Jun 2022Completion:
14 Jun 2022Final Change Report issued
Completed
Start:
14 Jun 2022Due:
22 Jun 2022Completion:
22 Jun 2022Responsible Committee Decision
Completed
Start:
22 Jun 2022Due:
29 Jun 2022Completion:
29 Jun 2022Status
Implementation Date
18 July 2022
Implementation Status
Date Raised
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed solution summary
- As a Consumer, I want my Energy Supplier to resolve any Switching or billing issues in a timely manner without unnecessary delays, so that I can receive accurate and timely bills from my chosen Energy Supplier.
- As an SDEP User, I want to understand any changes to SDEP messages I need to send and receive that may impact my business, so I can engage in the process and plan any required changes to my processes.
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
R0045 - Draft Legal Text
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
The Secure Data Exchange Portal (SDEP) will be updated at CSS Go-Live Date to reflect the new processes being introduced as part of REC V3.0. The SDEP messages and Data Items in the Energy Market Architecture Repository (EMAR) do not currently reflect these new processes. SDEP users require the Data Specification to accurately reflect the messages and Data Items to enable them to meet their obligations.
Stages Selection
SME
SME Role
Lead Technical Analyst
SME User
beth.brown@capgemini.com
Changes to SDEP Messages.docx
R0045 - CP Form (Downloadable version)
R0045 - Change Proposal Plan v2.0 (Approved)
R0045 - Initial Assessment Report v2.0 (Approved)
R0045 - Preliminary Change Report v1.0
R0045 - Consolidated Consultation Responses v1.0
R0045 - Final Change Report v2.0
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required
Performance Assurance Board Terms of Reference
Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0042
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
Yes
Latest Update
_
Summary
-
Change Plan
Solution Walkthrough
Completed
Start:
14 Apr 2022Due:
17 May 2022Completion:
17 May 2022Change Proposal Plan Approval
Completed
Start:
17 May 2022Due:
17 May 2022Completion:
17 May 2022Preliminary Change Report Published
Completed
Start:
17 May 2022Due:
20 May 2022Completion:
20 May 2022Consultation Start
Completed
Start:
20 May 2022Due:
20 May 2022Completion:
20 May 2022Consultation End
Completed
Start:
20 May 2022Due:
07 Jun 2022Completion:
07 Jun 2022Responsible Committee Decision
Completed
Start:
07 Jun 2022Due:
05 Jul 2022Completion:
05 Jul 2022Appeals Window Closes
Not Started
Start:
05 Jul 2022Due:
19 Jul 2022Completion:
Status
Implementation Date
18 July 2022
Implementation Status
Date Raised
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed solution summary
- As a REC Service Provider, I need the REC PAB to be able to make decisions on emergency operational change appeals and derogation requests in a timely manner, to ensure the Switching Service remains operational and effective.
- As a REC PAB member, I need to be able to make decisions on emergency operational change appeals and derogation requests in a timely manner, to ensure the Switching Service remains operational and effective.
- As a member of the Switching CAB, I need the REC PAB to make decisions on emergency operational change appeals and derogation requests in a timely manner, to ensure the Switching Service remains operational and effective. As a REC PAB Member, I need the quoracy requirements to be effective, so that meetings can go ahead and make decisions without the need to support additional ex-committee processes.
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
REC PAB - ToR - REC v3.0 Draft
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
Following the implementation of REC V3.0, the current REC PAB ToR will not support extraordinary meetings and quoracy arrangements driven by the Switching CAB or the appeals route from the Switching CAB to the REC PAB. This change seeks to update the REC PAB ToR to fully represent the changes being implemented as part of REC V3.0, and to also address lessons learnt during the REC PAB’s first year of operation.
Stages Selection
SME
SME Role
Lead Technical Analyst
SME User
rosalind.timperley
R0042 - CP Form (Downloadable version)
R0042 - Change Proposal Plan v1.0 (Approved)
R0042 - Preliminary Change Report v1.0 (Approved)
R0042 - Initial Assessment Report v1.0 (Approved)
R0042 - Final Change Report v2.0 (Approved)
R0042 - Consolidated Consultation Responses
Company Name
REC Code Manager - Performance Assurance
Review status
Review required