Changes to Terms of reference following acceptance of R0167
Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0188
Change Path
Urgent
No
Latest Update
20/08/2024 - Approved for implementation on 06/09/2024.
Summary
This Housekeeping Change Proposal seeks to update the Terms of Reference of the REC Change Panel and the Performance Assurance Board, following the acceptance of R0167, to reflect Issues.
Impacted Consumers
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Implementation Date
06 September 2024
| Included changes | Affected REC Items | |
|---|---|---|
| R0003 | Market-wide Half-Hourly Settlement Implementation |
Implementation Status
Date Raised
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
REC Change Panel - Terms of Reference
Archive
Off
Document title
REC Performance Assurance Board (PAB) - Terms of Reference
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
This Housekeeping Change Proposal seeks to update the Change Panel and Performance Assurance Board, Terms of Reference to reflect that these Committees consider change Issues as well as Change Proposals.
Stages Selection
R0188 - Change Proposal Form
R0188 - Housekeeping Change Report (Post Approval)
Company Name
Rec Manager
Review status
Review required
Schedule 8 Review and Best Practice Guidance Development
Date of latest update
Type
Issue
ID
I0187
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
26/06/2026 On 25 June 2026, the REC Change Panel approved this extension to plan.
Summary
Schedule 8 - Unbilled Energy Code of Practice has not been reviewed since its development for REC go-live. This Issue seeks to understand if there are any conflicts in the Schedule with best practice and identify any gaps or duplication. Alongside this, a best practice guidance document will be developed which is relevant, complete and aligned to current processes and obligations.
Change Plan
Proposal Plan Approved at Change Panel
Completed
Start:
Due:
Completion:
21 Jan 2025Impacted Consumers
Impacted REC Documents
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed solution summary
- A new version of Schedule 8.
- Implementation of a new Category 3 guidance document.
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
I0187 - Change Report (Proposal Plan) V1.0 (Pre-Approval) 09.01.2025
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
Schedule 8 - Unbilled Energy Code of Practice has not been reviewed since its development for REC go-live. The Schedule needs to be reviewed to ensure it is up to date, understand if there are any conflicts with best practice and identify any gaps or duplication.
Stages Selection
Stages Selection
I0187 - Change Proposal Form
I0187 - Change Report (Proposal Plan) V1.0 (Approved) 21.01.2025
I0187 - Change Report (Extension to Plan) Approved 17.06.2025
I0187 - Change Report (Extension to Plan) 02.09.2025
I0187 - Change Report (Extension to Plan) 13.01.2025 (Pre-Approval)
I0187 - Change Report (Extension to Plan) V1.0 Approved 25.06.2026
Company Name
Code Manager
Review status
Review required
Gas Meter Type Code - Thermal Mass Measurement
Date of latest update
Type
Issue
ID
I0184
Urgent
No
Latest Update
16/10/2024 - This Change Issue has been withdrawn at the request of the proposer.
Summary
Empty
Impacted Consumers
Impacted REC Documents
Impacted REC Services
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Stages Selection
Stages Selection
I0184 - Change Proposal Form (PDF)
Company Name
Octopus Energy Ltd
Review status
Review required
DPI Extract from CSS
Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0183
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
11/03/2025 - The proposer has withdrawn the request due to the expected delivery of enquiry data in the same anticipated timescales & the continued pursuance of I0224. The adoption window has closed.
Summary
It has emerged that there are data quality issues relating to the Domestic Premises Indicator (DPI) Data Item, where MPxNs have been recorded as having the wrong DPI. This Change has been raised to identify a mechanism by which this issue can be resolved.
Change Plan
Solution Analysis and Development
In Progress
Start:
11 Jun 2024Due:
20 Sep 2024Completion:
Impacted Consumers
Impacted REC Documents
Impacted REC Services
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed solution summary
- C1 - As a Consumer, I want industry data relating to my energy supply to be accurate, so that I do not experience any issues when switching or engaging with other consumer facing industry practices.
- M1 - As a CSS User, I want available DPI data to be accurate, so that when I engage with industry processes that require DPI data, I am confident that I am engaging with the right information. M2 - As the CSS, I want to provide accurate data to CSS Users, so that I am able to facilitate successful industry operations for my Users.
Problem Statement
Inaccurate DPI data available within industry data sources can result in less accuracy within REC processes that utilise this data, and poorer consumer outcomes. DPI data accuracy needs to be improved to ensure that industry processes and Consumers are not impacted.
Stages Selection
SME
SME Role
Lead Technical Analyst
SME User
maxime.van-eyseren@capgemini.com
SME Role
Lead Assurance Analyst
SME User
vaishnsharma@deloitte.co.uk
Change Proposal Form
R0183 Change Report V3.0 02.12.2024
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required
Proposal for Limiting Queries in EES API Calls (Single Query per API Call)
Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0179
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
This Change Proposal has been implemented as part of the February 2026 REC Release.
Summary
This issue has been raised proposing to establish a limit on the number of queries permitted within a single Application Programming Interface (API) call. As there is potential for performance degradation and system instability that can occur when a large number of queries are made in a single API call to the Electricity Enquiry Services (EES) API. The aim would be to prevent overwhelming the system and ensure consistent response times and reliability. Therefore, this proposes implementing a limit of 1000 queries per single API call.
Change Plan
Request for Information
Completed
Start:
03 Jun 2024Due:
05 Jul 2024Completion:
05 Jul 2024Change Issue Group
Completed
Start:
05 Jul 2024Due:
01 Aug 2024Completion:
01 Aug 2024Impacted Consumers
Impacted REC Services
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Implementation Date
27 February 2026
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
Request For Information (RFI)
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
The absence of a limit on the number of queries (batch processing) within a single API call could cause performance issues and system instability. As a result, system responsiveness may degrade when a large number of queries are made in a single call, impacting user experience and hindering the ability of the EES API to consistently meet user demands.
Stages Selection
SME
SME Role
Lead Technical Analyst
SME User
maxime.van-eyseren@capgemini.com
Issue Form
EES API Interface Specification REDLINE DRAFT for R0179
R0179 - Change Report - Final Recommendation Approved
R0179 Change Report (Consultation)
R0179 Consolidated consultation responses (non- confidential)
Re-baseline Change Plan 15.07.25
Consolidated IA responses (non-confidential)
I0179 Change Report (Impact Assessment)
Service Provider - Impacts Data
I0179 - Consolidated RFI Responses
Change Report (Proposal Plan)
Consultation on implementation date response
Change Report - Final Recommendation (new implementation date)
Company Name
RECCo
Review status
Review required
Improvements to CSS Business Process Logic
Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0178
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
17/06/2026 - The Code Manager has published an Update to Plan. This will be presented to the REC Technical Expert Panel at their meeting on 24 June 2026.
Summary
This change proposal is aimed towards rectifying a collection of issues that were identified with the CSS Business Process Logic. These have been identified as follows: 1. Deactivation of an active reg. whilst in-flight switch in progress 2. Deactivation of a prior cancelled registration 3. OFAF switch containing multiple MPxN
Impacted Consumers
Impacted REC Services
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Implementation Date
25 June 2027
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed solution summary
- Deactivation of an active reg. whilst in-flight switch in progress As mentioned previously, the ‘Deactivation of an active reg. whilst in-flight switch in progress’ issue did have an existing REC CP raised and therefore is further along the discussion process compared to the other two issues identified. Initial discussion outlined that the most appropriate solution for this change proposal should consider the business needs and the desired outcomes. It was noted that from a business perspective, if the switch has already been accepted, then it should still go through and not be cancelled. Therefore, the following points were raised: • It was acknowledged that there are multiple solution options/approaches that could potentially be employed to resolve this issue. As such, and to avoid being overly prescriptive, it is requested that CSS provider investigate all possible options and outline their recommendation for the most suitable approach, which would be developed/progressed further through the subsequent Impact Assessments. • However, the aim is for an effective solution to be developed which would ensure that the consumer is switched with the original effective date being used and that CSS systems could cater for such registration events whilst following the normal Gate Closure processes. • Where possible, the solution should also look to proactively mitigate the impact of this scenario, as opposed to working on a retrospective basis which can lead to the issue persisting over an extended period of time. It was also noted that consideration would need to be given to state of the meters as this would also have an impact on whether switches are able to progress: Therefore, the following points were raised: • The solution would need to consider how the incumbent supplier has deactivated the meter and whether it has been moved to a ‘terminated’ state or a ‘dormant’ state. o Dormant – The meter is inactive. Note that this is a temporary state and therefore the meter could be put back into service. o Terminated – The meter has reached end of life and cannot be reinstated. Note that this is a permanent state. • If the incumbent supplier has moved the meter into a ‘terminated’ state, the in-flight switch would then need to be cancelled. • However, for the ‘dormant’ state, the following two options would be available in terms of what could happen to the status of the meter and thus the in-flight switch: o Moves from ‘inactive’ to ‘active’ (continue with the switch) o Moves from ‘inactive’ to ‘cancelled’ (cannot continue with the switch)
- Deactivation of a prior cancelled registration and OFAF switch contains multiple of the same MPxN It is noted that the initial approach discussed was to add new Business Data Validation Rules (BDVR) to stop these issues from occurring. However, this was only discussed at high-level and therefore we request that the CSS provider confirm this approach and provide further details as this change proposal progresses.
Problem Statement
1) Deactivation of an active reg. whilst in-flight switch in progress: There are instances where the incumbent supplier is withdrawing prior to the ‘Supply Effective from Date’, causing the accepted switch to fail at Gate Closure which occurs at 17:00hrs. This creates the scenario in which there is no longer a losing supplier for the consumer to switch from, and therefore the switch process stalls and cannot be progressed. Therefore, this has a direct impact on consumers who have a switch request which has already been accepted but CSS is not able to progress further as the switch process stops. Indeed, there have been a total of 82 missing messages observed since 1st January 2023, of which 66 messages have been related to switches where there was no registered Supplier recorded at Gate Closure. The 30th September 2023 Gate Closure was particularly impacted by this scenario and resulted in 45 registrations which did not become effective on 14th October 2023 as planned. It should also be noted that the 1st October is one of the key contracting dates for large Industrial and Commercial (I&C) consumers, consequently increasing the impact to consumers in this instance. 2) Deactivation of a prior cancelled registration: This scenario occurs when the registered supplier of a MPxN (via the active registration) is the same supplier that cancelled a previous switch for the same MPxN. In this case there is the possibility that the supplier could attempt to deactivate the active registration by accidentally providing the cancelled registration identifier. Currently, CSS still accepts the deactivation request and erroneously changes the cancelled registration state from cancelled to inactive, sending out securedInactive messages. Currently, after an MPxN is disconnected, the Supplier is required to submit a deregistration request to CSS. Therefore, there is a possibility that the suppliers could submit this request for a cancelled registration not active registration. CSS would still accept this request as the Business Data Validation Rules (BDVR) lack coverage of this case; in such cases the Supplier may incorrectly believe that they have deregistered the MPANs. 3) OFAF switch containing multiple MPxN: This is the instance where the end user sends through a One Fail All Fail (OFAF) switch with the same MPxN contained within the payload 2 or more times. Multiple registration IDs are created for the same MPxN, and the registration is left in an incorrect state given a lack of appropriate BDVRs. Indeed, there has been a further reported incident regarding an OFAF transaction of the same MPxN. The primary MPxN was associated with a secondary MPxN and therefore two registrations were created for the primary and secondary MPxN, equating to four registrations in total. There was then an objection raised but this only cancelled 1 of the 2 registrations for each MPxN. The remaining 2 registrations proceeded through gate closure.
Stages Selection
SME
SME Role
Lead Technical Analyst
SME User
maxime.van-eyseren@capgemini.com
R0178 - Change Proposal Form
R0178 - Change Report (Proposal Plan) V2.0 (18.02.2025)
R0178 - Update to Proposal Plan V1.0 (Approved) 18.02.2025
R0178 - Consolidated Impact Assessment Responses (Non-Confidential) 18.03.2026
R0178 - Change Report (For Consultation) V1.0
R0178 - Update to Plan (17.06.2026) Pre-Approval
Company Name
REC Technical Services
Review status
Review required
Change Smart Meter Installation Consumer Survey Specification survey questions to a REC Category 2 document
Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0177
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
This change was implemented on 06 September 2024.
Summary
Adding the Smart Meter Installation Consumer Survey Specification questions to the REC list of documents will allow any amendments to follow the REC change process and allow anyone to propose such amendments.
Change Plan
Preliminary Change Report published
Completed
Start:
22 May 2024Due:
05 Jul 2024Completion:
04 Jul 2024Consultation opened
Completed
Start:
05 Jul 2024Due:
05 Jul 2024Completion:
04 Jul 2024Consultation closes
Completed
Start:
05 Jul 2024Due:
26 Jul 2024Completion:
26 Jul 2024Final Change Report published
Completed
Start:
26 Jul 2024Due:
09 Aug 2024Completion:
08 Aug 2024Change Panel decision
Completed
Start:
09 Aug 2024Due:
20 Aug 2024Completion:
20 Aug 2024Impacted Consumers
Impacted REC Documents
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Implementation Date
06 September 2024
| Included changes | Affected REC Items | |
|---|---|---|
| R0003 | Market-wide Half-Hourly Settlement Implementation |
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed solution summary
- As a Domestic or Micro-Business Consumer, I want the Smart Meter Installation survey questions to have robust governance, so I have confidence the right KPIs are being monitored.
- As an Energy Supplier, I want the Smart Meter Installation survey questions to be governed by the REC Change Process, so I can suggest and provide feedback on changes to them.
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
REC Baseline Statement DRAFT
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
The Smart Meter Installation Consumer Survey Specification questions are mandatory for Energy Suppliers to use, but there is no mechanism for Energy Suppliers to raise changes or issues against the questions as they are not held in the REC Baseline Statement.
Stages Selection
R0177 Change Proposal Form
R0177 Change Proposal Plan v1.0 Approved
R0177 Initial Assessment Report v1.0 Approved
R0177 Preliminary Change Report v1.0
R0177 Consolidated Consultation Responses v1.0
R0177 Change Report (Final Recommendation) V1.1
Company Name
Gemserv
Review status
Review required
Clarify & Strengthen CRS Providers Requirements
Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0168
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
This Change Proposal was implemented on 28 February 2025.
Summary
The RECCo MSI review focused on the analysis and assessment of; Code compliance, performance, impacts and insights from lessons learned feedback from impacted stakeholders. These assessments thematically articulated changes and improvements identified to assure industry market participants that clear and appropriate action is, and will be, taken to prevent, detect and mitigate the risks and impacts of another event, and prepare for the right response to any future incidents. This Issue has been raised to address learnings from the P1 switching incident in July 2023.
Impacted Consumers
Impacted REC Documents
Impacted REC Services
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Implementation Date
28 February 2025
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed solution summary
- Root Cause Communication: That the DCC, in its role as Switching Operator, delivers, clear, accurate, timely information on the incident root cause, as soon as possible, once it has obtained a reasonable understanding. Both to offset the risks of uncertainty and limited information introduce, ensuring Switching parties (like Supplier, TPIs and Networks) have the right information to enable meaningful engagement, assist their end-consumers, and all impacted Market Participants can more proactively manage the incident impacts, including making appropriate plans in response to the incident and its resolution. Switching Operator's End-Consumer Communication: Introduce a requirement for the DCC, in its role as the Switching Operator, to provide end-consumer appropriate information for REC Parties and Non-REC Parties use to determine communication and action for their Consumers.
- Switching Operator, Switching Incident Impact Assessment: This change should clarify the existing Switching Operator’s broader obligation to assess an incidents impact on the wider Switching Arrangements (set out in REC Schedule 26, Switching Service Management Schedule (SSMS), section 1.7, or Major Switching Incidents starting at section 2.9), to ensure the Switching Operator facilitates the most effective, efficient (time, cost, resource) overall Switching industry solution is promoted and implemented. Incident Wider Switching Impact Assessment: Clarify that if a Major Switching Incident is not going to be resolved within defined Service levels (4 hours), then the DCC in its role as Switching Operator should determine the impact on compliance with the REC end-to-end Switching Arrangements, and work with Ofgem, and the Code Administrators for BSC, UNC and DCUSA, and RECCo, to identify the cross code impacts/impacts on other Codes when managing an incident and developing an appropriate solution for industry, with least negative impact to end-consumers.
- Refresh and testing of Switching Operator’s (SO) incident related policies, processes, and procedures, to ensure they remain fit for purpose.
- Refresh and testing of Switching Operator’s (SO) incident related policies, processes, and procedures, to ensure they remain fit for purpose.
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
I0168 Switching Operator MSI Best Practice Document - for RFI and Industry Comments (02.08.2024)
Archive
Off
Document title
Central Switching Service (CSS) Service Definition (R0168 - Red-lining) 05.12.2024
Archive
Off
Document title
Switching Operator (SO) Service Definition (R0168 - Red-lining) 05.12.2024
Archive
Off
Document title
Schedule 26 - Switching Service Management Schedule (R0168 - Red-lining) 05.12.2024
Archive
Off
Document title
R0168 Draft Switching Operator Best Practice Document (V1.0 for Industry Consultation) 05.12.2024 (Word Version)
Archive
Off
Document title
R0168 Draft Switching Operator Best Practice Document (V1.0 for Industry Consultation) 05.12.2024 (PDF Version)
Archive
Off
Document title
R0168 - Change Report (for Consultation) 12.12.2024
Archive
Off
Document title
Schedule 26 - Switching Service Management Schedule (R0168 - Red-lining) 28.01.2025
Archive
Off
Document title
Central Switching Service (CSS) Service Definition (R0168 - Red-lining) 28.01.2025
Archive
Off
Document title
Switching Operator (SO) Service Definition (R0168 - Red-lining) 28.01.2025
Archive
Off
Document title
Major Switching Incident: Switching Operator Best Practice Document V0.2
Archive
Off
Document title
Major Switching Incident: Switching Operator Best Practice Evaluation Form V1.0
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
On 6th July 2023, a Major Switching Incident occurred with the Central Switching Service ((CSS) operated by the Switching Operator and CSS Service Provider, the Smart Data Communication Company (DCC)). It prevented the successful completion of that day’s planned electricity and gas, supply switches and new registrations. The CSS was stabilised post-incident and any new requests submitted after 9 a.m., 6th July were processed successfully. Through the collective action of the Switching Operator and industry parties, the CSS sent the missing industry messages to give effect to the intended switches and new registrations during the period of the 2nd to the 8th of August 2023. Priority 1 (P1) Major Switching Incidents of this nature are required to be resolved within 4 hours; however, DCC reported it took 1,605.6 hours in this instance. This incident had significant impacts on multiple industry parties and end consumers, demonstrating a clear need for improvement in the arrangements managing switching services and response to major incidents. The Retail Energy Code Company ((RECCo) with the assistance of its Code Manager) completed an end-to-end incident review; to identify the root cause, consider the efficiency and effectiveness of the incident management response, assess the improvements required, and identify appropriate actions for risk mitigation. With the overarching objective that by delivering the identified review recommendations, these actions should limit the possibility, or minimise the impact of, any future major switch incidents.
Stages Selection
SME
SME Role
Lead Assurance Analyst
SME User
vaishnsharma@deloitte.co.uk
I0168 - Issue Form
I0168 Switching Operator MSI Best Practice Document - for RFI and Industry Comments (02.08.2024)
I0168 - Change Report (Change Plan) (Approved) 17.09.2024
I0168 - Update to Proposal Plan (Approved 30.10.2024)
R0168 - Consolidated Consultation Responses (Non-Confidential) 20.01.2025
R0168 - Change Report (Final Reccomendation) 04.02.2025 (Approved) V2.0
Company Name
-
Review status
Review required
Removal of the Green Deal Panel
Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0166
Change Category
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
23/08/2024 - This change was successfully implemented as part of the August 2024 Extraordinary REC Release on 23 August 2024.
Summary
This Change Proposal seeks to remove the Green Deal Panel Terms of Reference from the REC Baseline Statement and product set, and to amend the Change Panel Terms of Reference to incorporate consideration of Green Deal business.
Change Plan
Preliminary Change Report Published
Completed
Start:
22 Apr 2024Due:
09 May 2024Completion:
09 May 2024Consultation Issued
Completed
Start:
09 May 2024Due:
09 May 2024Completion:
09 May 2024Final Change Report Issued
Completed
Start:
09 May 2024Due:
07 Jun 2024Completion:
07 Jun 2024Responsible Committee Decision
Completed
Start:
07 Jun 2024Due:
18 Jun 2024Completion:
18 Jun 2024Impacted Consumers
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Implementation Date
23 August 2024
| Included changes | Affected REC Items | |
|---|---|---|
| R0103 | Central provision of DCC Technical Contacts for requesting test certificates |
|
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed solution summary
- As a party I want Green Deal matters, should they arise to be dealt with in a timely fashion. This could be difficult under the current arrangements where it is not possible to get a quorate panel to make decisions.
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
REC Change Panel - Terms of Reference - Red-lined
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
Since the REC was established, no business has been raised that would require the Green Deal Panel to meet and therefore the group has not yet convened. As well as being an unnecessary administrative consideration, it is a challenge to keep the Members and Chair abreast of the wider REC Change Process, and the Green Deal Panel may therefore find it more challenging to discharge its functions in the event that it needs to be convened.
Stages Selection
Change Proposal Form
R0166 - Change Proposal Plan v1.0 (Approved)
R0166 - Initial Assessment Report (Approved)
R0166 - Preliminary Change Report V1.0
R0166 Final Change Report v1.0
Company Name
REC Code Manager
Review status
Review required
Removing the Enumerations from Communications Method Data Item (J0386) to align with BSC CP 1594
Date of latest update
Type
Change
ID
R0164
Other Industry Codes impacted
Change Path
Priority
Urgent
No
Latest Update
23/08/2024 - This change was successfully implemented as part of the August 2024 Extraordinary REC Release on 23 August 2024.
Summary
BSC has raised Change Proposal CP1594 which seeks to create an approvals process and a valid set for communications method. This change is proposing to create an approvals process to allow for the managed end dating of older technologies, such as Public switched telephone network (PSTN), Circuit Switched Data (CSD) and later 2G, and the assessment of the validity of newer communications technologies, such as (but not exclusively) Narrow Band-Intern of Things (NBIoT) and Category M (CAT-M). The evolution of metering communication systems underscores the need for timely updates. Legacy systems risk inefficiencies and potential security vulnerabilities. Implementing an approval process, modelled on BSCP601, ensures a standardised approach to introducing new technologies and managing the exit of old ones. Further justifications include: • To allow for the centrally managed end-dating of redundant communications technologies in line with known deadlines for those technologies to become redundant and unreliable. • To allow for the wider industry education of newer types of communication technologies. • To create and expand the already existing central knowledge base of the evolution and attributes of newer communication technologies as they relate to Settlement Metering Equipment. • To ensure transparency for all industry participants on the newer communications types available and the dates for which legacy communications must be removed. CP1594 will create a valid set, linked to the new approval process and using Data Item J0386 as a conduit to detail the approved communication methods as well as end dates for communication methods which are becoming redundant and unreliable.
Change Plan
PARTY IMPACT ASSESSMENT ISSUED
Completed
Start:
16 Apr 2024Due:
25 Apr 2024Completion:
25 Apr 2024PRELIMINARY CHANGE REPORT AND CONSULTATION ISSUED
Completed
Start:
25 Apr 2024Due:
23 May 2024Completion:
23 May 2024FINAL CHANGE REPORT ISSUED
Completed
Start:
23 May 2024Due:
20 Jun 2024Completion:
20 Jun 2024RESPONSIBLE COMMITTEE DECISION
Completed
Start:
20 Jun 2024Due:
02 Jul 2024Completion:
02 Jul 2024Impacted Consumers
Impacted REC Parties and Market Participants
Status
Implementation Date
23 August 2024
| Included changes | Affected REC Items | |
|---|---|---|
| R0103 | Central provision of DCC Technical Contacts for requesting test certificates |
|
Implementation Status
Date Raised
Fuel
REC Decision Maker
Date of Update to Priority
Solution Development
Proposed solution summary
- As a Supplier/DNO/MEM, I want to ensure that Market Messages I send or receive to contain up-to-date, accurate data, so that I am able to effectively engage with the wider industry.
- As a non-REC Party Service User I want to ensure that Market Messages I send or receive to contain up-to-date, accurate data, so that I am able to effectively engage with the wider industry.
Proposed Solution Document
Document title
R0164 - Draft Solution - J0386 Data Item - Data Spec Changes 22.05.24
Archive
Off
Problem Statement
The BSC are making changes to how permissible Outstation communication methods are captured and recorded within the industry. In order to align with these BSC led changes, the REC Data Specification must be reviewed in order to update the affected Data Item – DI50178 (J0386).
Stages Selection
SME
SME Role
Lead Technical Analyst
SME Role
Lead Assurance Analyst
R0164 - Change Proposal Form (Word)
R0164 Change Proposal Form (PDF)
R0164 Change Proposal Plan (Approved) V1.0
R0164 Initial Assessment Report (Approved) V1.0
R0164 Consolidated Impact Assessment Responses v1.0 23.05.24
R0164 Preliminary Change Report (Published For Consultation) V1.0 23.05.24
R0164 Consolidated Consultation Responses v1.0 20.06.24
R0164 Final Change Report (Post-Vote) v1.0 03.07.24
Company Name
Elexon
Review status
Review required